(+64) 027 534 4149 [email protected]

You’re Spending a Fortune on Recruitment. Here’s What That Money Could Be Doing Instead.

You’re Spending a Fortune on Recruitment. Here’s What That Money Could Be Doing Instead.

Run the numbers on your kitchen recruitment spend for the past 12 months. Job board listings. Agency fees. Management time spent on interviews. Onboarding cost. Lost productivity during the gap period. The ramp-up time before a new hire reaches full capability.

For most hospitality operations, the total is significantly higher than expected. SHRM benchmarking data puts the average cost of hiring a new employee at approximately $4,700.

Cornell’s Center for Hospitality Research puts the true cost of kitchen staff turnover at over $5,800 per person when you include training time and productivity loss.

Now multiply that by your annual turnover rate. In an industry where back-of-house roles turn over at 43% per year, a 20-person kitchen team could be costing you the equivalent of four full salaries annually – just to stand still.

The Revolving Door Is Expensive By Design

The hospitality sector’s recruitment cycle is expensive not because hiring is inherently costly, but because hiring without retention is a loop with no exit. Every new hire who leaves after 6–12 months resets the clock and restarts the spend. The industry spent enormous amounts in 2024 on recruitment – nearly 3 million workers quit leisure and hospitality in the first four months of the year alone in the US, at 204% the national average quit rate.

The operators who are breaking out of this loop aren’t doing it by finding better candidates. They’re doing it by giving the candidates they already have a reason to stay.

Retention investments – when structured correctly – have a compounding return that recruitment spend never does. A retained employee becomes more skilled, more productive, and more loyal with every passing month. A replaced employee starts the cost clock again.

Reframing the Training Budget

There’s a common hesitation here, and it’s worth addressing directly: what if we invest in training someone and they leave?

It’s a legitimate question. But consider the alternative framing: what if you don’t invest in training them, and they leave anyway – taking a less skilled, less engaged, and less loyal version of themselves to your next problem?

The data consistently shows that structured professional development is one of the strongest predictors of staff retention. Employees who feel their employer is invested in their growth are significantly less likely to resign – and more likely to advocate for the organisation as a place to work.

In 2024, nearly 10,000 workers in North America participated in registered hospitality apprenticeships – a 43% increase over five years. The operators driving that growth aren’t doing so out of altruism. They’re doing it because the return on development spend outperforms the return on recruitment spend, reliably and measurably.

Seeking better avenues for your kitchen recruitment?

Check out our new program.